ScreenCrave.com » Daniel Radcliffe

News Roundup: Katy Perry 3D, Kevin Smith Addresses Groupies, Gary Oldman Recaps ‘Jersey Shore’ and More

Laura Aguirre — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:34:36 +0000

This week Daniel Radcliffe came out and admitted to being drunk on the Harry Potter set. We knew he had trouble with alcohol, but really? Well, drunk or not, we’ll always remember him as Harry Potter. Comedian Chris Rock told the L.A. Times that he’s got some serious plans for himself and Bridesmaids star Melissa McCarthy. And, Gary Oldman went on Jimmy Kimmel to cover this week’s episode of “Jersey Shore“. Catch up below.

Mindy Kaling Lands TV Show: The awesome Mindy Kaling, Kelly from “The Office“, has landed a major gig with Fox. According to Deadline, the studio has given the green light to her single-camera comedy. The show will center around Kaling as a young “Bridget Jones-type” Ob/Gyn doctor balancing her personal and professional life. The only bad news is, if Fox picks up the series, Kaling will no longer be coming back to “The Office”. Oh well!
Katy Perry 3D: Katy Perry is following in Justin Bieber‘s footsteps. The pop sensation might be headed to the big screen, according to The Hollywood Reporter. Paramount has already started the dealmaking with Perry’s camp to create a documentary-style 3D film centered around the colorful singer.
Drunk Harry Potter: In recent years Daniel Radcliffe has been pretty vocal about his previous drinking problem. Well, this week he brought the subject up again during an interview with Heat Magazine, and told them that while he never drank on the Harry Potter set, he did go into work drunk. Next time we watch one of the Potter films, we’ll be trying to figure out if he’s hammered or not. Read the whole interview at Heat Magazine.
Now on VOD: This week a new film titled, After Fall, Winter hit VOD. The film is described a “dangerous, sexy, poignant, and at times [darkly] funny story” about two people looking for love. The film is written, produced and directed by Eric Schaeffer and stars him and Lizzie Brochere. Check out the trailer at the film’s official site.
Chris Rock To Mary Melissa McCarthy: Chris Rock told the L.A. Times this week that he’s writing a new script in which he and Academy Award nominee Melissa McCarthy play a “Jerry Springer couple.” We don’t know about you, but that something we’d love to see.

New Videos:

Kevin Smith Talks Groupies And More: Kevin Smith’s comedy “Burn In Hell” is about to be released (on EpixHD) on February 11. Below are some clips to get you excited.

Kevin Smith Addresses Groupies:

Kevin Smith Loves Austin:

Gary Oldman Recaps “Jersey Shore”: And lastly, we have Oscar nominee Gary Oldman reading a recap of this week’s “Jersey Shore” on Jimmy Kimmel. Watch it, it’s so worth it.

That’s the end of our round-up. Keep checking back at ScreenCrave for more entertainment news.

What are you excited for?

News Round-Up: Daniel Radcliffe, Mickey Rourke and More

Damon Houx — Wed, 19 Oct 2011 23:21:17 +0000

Piles of bits and pieces for the day:

- Mickey Rourke is getting his handprints immortalized at Grauman’s Chinese Theater. The theater has recently been offering more people to get their prints in their cement, with the Twilight Cast also recently were announced to be hand dippers as well. Part of this is trying to bring new life to the theater, which has been eclipse fiscally by the Arclight theater down the street.

- Daniel Radcliffe‘s got a new movie that isn’t Harry Potter, and there’s a teaser for it. The film is called The Woman in Black. Check it out…

- Harrison Ford knows of Uncharted, which seems drawn from the Indiana Jones films. Heck, he’s even played it.

Chronicle is a found footage superhero movie. Found footage is wearing out its welcome like woah, but the central conceit of this looks pretty good:

The most recognizable face there is Michael B. Jordan, familiar to fans of The Wire and Friday Night Lights.

- Mark Romanek is considered the front runner for The Lost Symbol, according to Deadline Hollywood. Romanek is coming off of Never Let Me Go, a film which I thought was the best film of last year, but also one that didn’t make much of an impact. romanek may need to make a film that makes some money, and this is something of a safe bet, even if it’s a sequel to The Da Vinci Code.

News News News!

Trailer For Daniel Radcliffe’s ‘The Woman In Black’ Is Released

traviswoods — Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:19:11 +0000

As we reported last summer, Daniel Radcliffe’s first post-Harry Potter film would be The Woman in Black, in which he portrays “a young lawyer who is ordered to travel to a remote corner of the UK and sort out some papers of a client who’s recently died. While ‘sorting’ he uncovers secrets and discovers that the local village is held hostage by the ghost of a scorned and vengeful woman.” And today, the trailer for the film was released.

Gaahhh, that was actually kinda spooky, especially since it avoided the typical modern horror trailer conventions of loud, booming jump music, and every ghost moving in that herky-jerk post-The Ring fashion that got really annoying about a decade ago and yet still persists.

Also, let’s give it points for not being a remake of a classic ‘70s/’80s slasher film (well, techinically it’s a remake of an ‘80s TV movie based on a book, but that’s not exactly classic), a reboot of a classic franchise, or a sequel to a seemingly never-ending torture porn franchise. Because that stuff isn’t getting old at all.

The Woman in Black is set to hit theaters in February 2012.

What do you think of The Woman in Black trailer?

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 – Movie Review

Mali Elfman — Thu, 14 Jul 2011 23:30:02 +0000

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2, the long awaited finale is finally here, and though fans will be able to cheer along to the film, my biggest problem is that they won’t really be able to cry. It’s hard not to like this film on some levels because even though it would never stand alone and won’t be the film we all remember from the series, it’s the finale! As always there’s plenty of fine acting, another special effects Oscar win for them lined up, and our lovable characters, BUT it’s all turned into a bit of a Soap Opera and for the end of something SO grand, the film never really makes the decisions to emotionally or tonally go HUGE which was needed in order for it to truly succeed.

(Note: And if you want me to talk about the 3D I can’t and won’t. For all of the other films to be made in 2-D and then this one to swap at the last second was a miss-step and only showed a side of the series that Harry Potter himself would scoff at — it’s not all about money for the viewers. It’s a “smart” business move, but this film should be in 2-D, is beautiful that way, and the 3D is a waste of your time, money and integrity.)

The Players:

Director: David Yates
Actors: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Ralph Fiennes, Alan Rickman, Michael Gambon and MANY more
Screenplay: Steve Kloves
Novel: J.K. Rowling (“Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows”)
Original Music by: Alexandre Desplat
Cinematography by: Eduardo Serra

The Plot:

The last film of the Harry Potter series. It all comes to an end.

The Good:

Our Trio: I still don’t know if it’s great casting, great teachers, growing up around such amazing actors, or just three amazing kids, but not only have our three main characters grown throughout the films, but they’ve grown into three mighty fine actors. Equivalents to the greats that supported them throughout the series. Despite the problems with the film, they’re always believable and seem to bring you back into almost any scene. This is their world and they were the ones who brought it to life for the audience – beautifully done.
Supporting Cast: Through the years, this has always been one of the highlights of the series, and once again it hasn’t failed them. Alan Rickman has always played one of my favorite characters and again he gives a great performance, Matthew Lewis who plays Neville Longbottom gave my favorite monologues of the film, Julie Walters as Molly Weasley fills your with delight and with one foul word will have you cheering… I can’t list everyone because I would just be listing the entire cast. All the little moments with the actors were really well done and appreciated.
The Effects: As always the Visual Effects department has stretched themselves and created an absolutely beautiful world for us to feast our eyes on (and no need for it to be done in 3D, the 2D color is better and gives you everything you need!.)

The Bad:

No Tears: I walked into this wanting to cry, wanting to get emotional, wanting to cheer and then sob my heart out — and there was nothing. There were moments of cheering, which was nice, but never I was never moved to emote anything more.Which leads to my overall problem of all of this being far too happy and never allowing for the film to settle in those dark moments and really revel in everything that’s happened and let the audience feel the severity of the situation. Also (SPOILER) when Voldemort finally faces off with Harry Potter, the last thing we want it a gag from Beatrix (who is great but was wrongly used in the moment). This was the moment we’ve been waiting for, for ten damn years! It’s a shame that it wasn’t taken more seriously.
Soap Opera-y: They had too much to explain and too many special effects to get in and as a result, it started to feel like they were forced to cram in as much information in one scene as possible so that they could spend time blowing up stuff in another. Harry was where? When? With who? She did what? Which means? Oh someone is running! But the action never had enough meaning to really hit home mainly because some of the exposition was weak at best and felt almost like an after-thought needing to tie things together.
Alan Rickman’s Make-Up: No excuses! A film like this should be visually perfect and despite the impressive special effects, Alan Rickman’s make-up was horrible! His eye liner looked like it was from Pirates of the Caribbean not ANY of the other Potter films! Small detail, but one that kept driving me nuts seeing as he’s one of my favorite characters!
The VERY End: (SPOILER) They’re supposed to have aged 19 years, Hermoine (Emma Watson) looked 25 tops, I don’t think it’s possible for a woman to age THAT gracefully (though maybe she knows a spell?). The only one who actually might have looked realistic was Ron (Rupert Grint), but overall the aging was really poorly done.
Didn’t Work as “Part 2″: I thought by them turning the last film into two films that they would have the time to really delve into the drama of it all, but instead the first film took away the severity needed to make the second film work. Without that direct pressure that the first film built, the second film is flimsy at best. Though I was excited about the idea of there being two films, they didn’t do it right. The ending would have meant so much more if both films would have been tied into one and they took out the excess and allowed the serious subject matter to really hit home.

Overall:

I loved Hogwarts the first time I saw it on the screen and the idea of it being destroyed and the series coming to a close is emotional, and I wanted to sob as I saw it fall to the floor, but the film just never moved me. The saddest part about this ending is the lack of sadness in the film. That being said, I’m still a fan of the series and perhaps watching both Deathly Hallows films back to back would give me the emotional closure I was hoping for. If you want to full effect, I’d recommend giving it a try.

Rating: 5/10

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 hits theaters July 15th!

Photos:

Trailer:

Daniel Radcliffe Ain’t Afraid of No Ghost… Wait, Maybe He is in The Woman in Black Trailer

Damon Houx — Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:28:26 +0000

Leaving a franchise after a decade (and eight pictures) has to be hard. Daniel Radcliffe is Harry Potter, and will be Harry Potter (fortunately he and the primary cast were paid very well). But Radcliffe is also an actor, and his most recent non-Potter film is The Woman in Black, which is a ghost story produced by Hammer and directed by James Watkins. Take a look…

Currently, it’s a teaser, so you get Radcliffle getting startled, and none of the other cast (which includes Ciaran Hinds). But the outfit looks good on him, and he slips well into period. He doesn’t look like the young boy we first met a decade ago, and he obviously doesn’t have a scar on his forehead. But this isn’t his first go at non-Potter roles.

What may be most exciting about this is that Radcliffe joins the illustrious ranks of Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee as a star of a Hammer horror film. Hammer was an important force in British cinema in the 50′s and 60′s (their influenced waned as the 1970′s and exploitation became more explicit). The company has been brought back from the dead, and recently co-produced Let Me In.

The film is set for release in October in the UK. When it shows up stateside is unknown, but if it’s good it may go theatrical. Of late, it seems more likely for the film to turn up On Demand.

Do you think Daniel Radcliffe has what it takes to work after Potter?

Daniel Radcliffe Wins Trevor Award

Damon Houx — Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:50:33 +0000

Being the face of Harry Potter for the last ten years has turned Daniel Radcliffe into an international icon and a household name. The twenty-one-year old actor grew up in front of the cameras, and with the franchise almost over he’s made it clear that he wants to pursue a career in acting, so he’ll likely stay in the spotlight. He’s also used that celebrity for good, as he’s won the Trevor Award for helping prevent suicide among gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered youth.

Radcliffe won the award for appearing in a number of Public Service Announcements that were aimed at helping in-distress teens deal with their sucicidal feelings, and has worked closely with the Trevor Project for a couple of years. The group was founded by filmmakers who won an academy award for their short film on the subject of a young teen who nearly kills himself after he comes out to his friends.

Working with The Trevor Project to begin with was a bold move on Radcliffe’s part, especially when most actors have to face the scrutiny of their love lives and sexuality being a part of the public discourse. Perhaps – with a majority of Americans recently shown to support same-sex unions – Radcliffe is just the first of many 21st century performers who support this cause without fear of it hurting their careers. Radcliffe will receive the award in June.

Do you think Daniel Radcliffe is a a hero?

Daniel Radcliffe Cast in The Amateur Photographer

Krystal Clark — Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:06:33 +0000

Daniel Radcliffe’s post Harry Potter career is really shaping up. As he leaves his Potter glasses and sweaters behind he’ll take on more serious and adult roles. According to Variety, the actor has signed on to star in a film from director Christopher Monger called The Amateur Photographer.

The Amateur Photographer is an indie comedy that centers on “a young man who discovers his artistic calling after being drafted by the denizens of a sleepy little New England mill town to serve as photographer of their most intimate moments. He battles local authorities while bringing a bit of a velvet revolution to the community.” The film is set in the 1970s, which should add an interesting context for the story.

Radcliffe has just wrapped production on the Hammer Films thriller The Woman in Black, and he’s expected to take his final step into the world of Potter entitled Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 this summer on July 15.

It looks like Radcliffe is trying to keep himself busy. We all know how difficult it is to make the transition from a child star in Hollywood.

What do you think of Radcliffe starring in The Amateur Photographer? Is he the right fit for the role?

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part I: Movie Review

Mali Elfman — Fri, 19 Nov 2010 03:00:41 +0000

It’s finally here! David Yates’ Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 flies into theaters this weekend. It feels like it’s been such a long time since we’ve seen Harry Potter on the big screen, it’s nice to finally continue the series with a film that is stronger than the last. In this film the Potter world takes a turn for the worse and our three lovable characters have to find a way to fight back. Despite the few problems with this film, Yates has delivered his a solid Potter film with more action, darkness and emotional depth than we’ve seen before (except for in Alfonso Cuaran’s).

Find out more about the film below…

Players:

Director: David Yates
Writer: Steve Kloves (screenplay), based on J.K. Rowling novel
Actors: Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Alan Rickman, Fiona Shaw, Ralph Fiennes, Helena Bonham Carter, Tom Felton
Original Music by: Alexandre Desplat
Cinematography by: Eduardo Serra

The Plot:

We begin by remembering one big thing, Professor Dumbledore is dead and now nothing is safe. Part 1 begins as Harry, Ron and Hermione set out on their perilous mission to track down and destroy the secret to Voldemort’s immortality and destruction–the Horcruxes. The three friends relationships are put to the test and they now must now rely on one another more than ever despite Dark Forces in their midst that threaten to tear them apart. The Death Eaters search for Harry with orders to bring him to Voldemort… alive. Harry’s only hope is to find the Horcruxes before Voldemort finds him.

The Good:

The Nazi/Facism Nod: Got to love a good nod to the Nazi regime! From the flyers, to the pure bloods screaming “but my father was a wizard!”, to mudbloods having to stand on trail and then hide out underground (though I’m sure most Jews would have loved to have a bit of magic to help them out). Though it was a bit obvious, it was a nice, messed up addition to the stories that helped show how big the war against Potter is and how much he’ll have to overcome.
The Acting: These three kids are amazing. Not only have they somehow all managed to not become power-hungry crackheads BUT they also can act, and very well I might add. Despite some of the issues I had with the story, all three main characters and the outstanding supporting, English cast who has literally left no English actor out at this point, all gave wonderful performances.
Dark Content: Though Alfonso Cuaran’s is still my favorite Potter film because of how dark he was able to take the tonality of the film, this was quite possibly the second darkest Potter film with some almost scary, definitely tense and sad moments that leave the audience feeling quite fulfilled.
The Finale: I won’t give anything away for those of you who haven’t head the books, but the character who gets the grand finale at the end of Part 1 is one the best characters in the series and it was nice to see so much time spent on his departure.
The Action: After David Yates told me in an interview that this film was the slow film and the next one is the action film, I’m worried for the second. There was plenty of appariting, flying, fighting, torturing for me in this one… anymore and it might turn into a straight Tony Scot/Michael Bay action film — here’s to hoping that doesn’t happen!

The Bad:

One Plot Device to the Next: The film very much jumps from one set piece to another. You move locations, get one emotional set-up, a physical event and then a conclusion… rinse and repeat, over and over again. The film as a whole is extremely formulaic, albeit entertaining.
Dancing Scene: Luckily Yates saved this by the end, but the start of the scene where Harry and Hermoine have a spontaneous dance moment felt a bit contrived. It was hard not to feel like they were intentionally trying to emotionally manipulative the audience. We get enough of this from Twilight, lets just leave it out of Potter. Which reminds me…
Twilight Nod!?: Yes, the “Twilight Vs. Midnight” line in the film is in fact in the book as well BUT something about the way this was shot made it feel like the entire film paused for these couple of lines and brought attention to them. It was worsened by the fact that you could feel people in the audience stop, look at one another and then keep going. Anything that takes you out of the world that the movie has created takes away from the experience and should be cut. So many things get cut from the book to the screen, why is that one important? And to further that, they say it three times and then end with a “Twilight might be better”. Though it probably had nothing to do with the Twilight series it’s hard for audience goers right now not to connect the two and get distracted.
The END: If you can call it that! This is supposed to be a film, not an episode in a TV series. We don’t have one week to wait for the next “episode” but SEVERAL months. Although I like who got the finale, the abrupt stop felt like an obvious “now you have to pay for another ticket” chop between the two films. It’s no Pirates of the Caribbean 2, but it will leave you pissed you can’t see the rest!

Overall:

Though this film had some faults I could pick at, it was quite an entertaining film and kept me interested from the action-adventure start, through the emotional moments and to the non-ending.

Rating: 7/10

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part I in theaters November 19th!

Photo Gallery:

Trailer:

Further Reading:

Video: Harry Potter Stars Say Twilight Sucks in Their Best American Accents

Krystal Clark — Thu, 18 Nov 2010 20:55:31 +0000

This weekend, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows : Part I will finally hit theaters. The film’s stars have been on a whirlwind promotional tour, and during it they met up with MTV’s Josh Horowitz to play a game on “American Talk.” It’s a segment where he interviewed the cast and got them to say various phrases using an American accent. Who do you think does the best Yankee impression? Find out below…

Horowitz interviewed Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, and Tom Felton and got them to put their acting talents to the test. Most of the film’s we’ve seen them in outside of Potter allows them to use their native British accents, but in this video they don’t have such comforts. They have to read whatever is on the card handed to them including “The Olive Garden,” “Glenn Beck,” and wait for it… “Twilight Sucks!”

Out of this group it seemed as if Felton was the most comfortable with the American. Did you notice how much enthusiasm he had in his voice? Most importantly, did you notice how easily the words “Twilight Sucks” rolled off his tongue? We can’t fault him for feeling the way he does about that.

Further Reading:

What do you think about the Potter kids and their American accents? Who passed and who failed?

Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson Are Done With Harry Potter

Krystal Clark — Fri, 12 Nov 2010 23:22:54 +0000

Next Friday the wait will finally be over. The end will begin at the opening of the latest Harry Potter film, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part I. The wizard franchise has literally been 10 years in the making and we’ve seen its stars Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint grow from children to adults. Recently, the actors spoke out about their future plans and revealed whether or not they’d be interested in reprising their roles years down the line.

People have continued to question Potter creator/author JK Rowling about whether or not she’ll write more books. For the most part her responses have been pretty open. She’s never said never, which means more Potter books and films could still be in our future. But if that is the case we shouldn’t expect Radcliffe or Watson to be a part of them.

In an interview with Sky News, Radcliffe said that it was “very doubtful” that he would return for a future film. And when asked about the possibility of more Potter books he said, “Oh God, she promised me categorically that there wouldn’t be another book involving Harry.” We guess a decade is enough of Harry for him.

As for Watson, the actress and college student wants to explore her options. She said, “This was one role and it transformed the whole of my life. But it doesn’t necessarily mean that this is what’s going to make me happy. I want to be able to explore a few other things as well.”

There you go. Two of the main actors want to stretch their wings after playing the same roles for half of their lives. Can we really blame them?

Further Reading:

What do you think of Radcliffe and Watson’s outlook on their future?

Source: CNN

Emma Watson, Daniel Radcliffe Explain Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows

Krystal Clark — Mon, 01 Nov 2010 22:16:19 +0000

This is the first day of November, which means Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is right around the corner. The film marks the beginning of the end for our wizard trio of Harry, Hermione, and Ron. With Part I hitting theaters on November 19th, Warner Bros has decided to give you one last behind the scenes look at the story of The Deathly Hallows. Check it out…

Part 1 begins as Harry, Ron and Hermione set out on their perilous mission to track down and destroy the secret to Voldemort’s immortality and destruction–the Horcruxes. On their own, without the guidance of their professors or the protection of Professor Dumbledore, the three friends must now rely on one another more than ever. But there are Dark Forces in their midst that threaten to tear them apart. It sounds like The Deathly Hallows will start off on a dark note.

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part I opens in theaters on November 19th and Part II opens on July 15, 2011. Both films are directed by David Yates.
Further Reading:

What do you think of the newest featurette for Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows?

Source: EW

Daniel Radcliffe Spoofs Robert Pattinson on The Simpsons

Krystal Clark — Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:42:55 +0000

We knew this would happen sooner or later. Robert Pattinson and Daniel Radcliffe have somehow morphed into the same person — sort of. Both actors headline lucrative and youth driven film franchises with Twilight and Harry Potter, and they both have die hard fans all over the world. But what would happen if they switched places? What if Radcliffe played an emo, manorexic vampire who sparkles in the sun? Find out when you tune in to a special episode of ” The Simpsons.”

Next month on November 7th, the long running animated series will once again air their annual “Tree House of Horror” episode, where Radcliffe will voice a character who looks vaguely familiar. Oh, who are we kidding, he looks just like Edward Cullen from the Twilight series but instead of having Pattinson voice his alter ego they reached out to Radcliffe.

In the episode, the character will be a vampire boy modeled after Cullen whose name is, wait for it…Edmund. He will fall in love with Lisa, who’ll play a Bella-type role, and Homer will try to keep them apart so his daughter doesn’t get turned into a bloodsucker. There’s no word on whether or not a Jacob/werewolf character will also appear in the story. But if he does, we think Rupert Grint would be the perfect person to play him.

What do you think of Radcliffe voicing a Pattinson-like character?

Source: Zap2it

ScreenCrave.com » Daniel Radcliffe

News Roundup: Katy Perry 3D, Kevin Smith Addresses Groupies, Gary Oldman Recaps ‘Jersey Shore’ and More

New Videos:

Related Posts

News Round-Up: Daniel Radcliffe, Mickey Rourke and More

Related Posts

Trailer For Daniel Radcliffe’s ‘The Woman In Black’ Is Released

Related Posts

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 – Movie Review

The Players:

The Plot:

The Good:

The Bad:

Overall:

Rating: 5/10

Photos:

Trailer:

Related Posts

Daniel Radcliffe Ain’t Afraid of No Ghost… Wait, Maybe He is in The Woman in Black Trailer

Related Posts

Daniel Radcliffe Wins Trevor Award

Related Posts

Daniel Radcliffe Cast in The Amateur Photographer

Related Posts

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part I: Movie Review

Players:

The Plot:

The Good:

The Bad:

Overall:

Rating: 7/10

Photo Gallery:

Trailer:

Related Posts

Video: Harry Potter Stars Say Twilight Sucks in Their Best American Accents

Related Posts

Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson Are Done With Harry Potter

Related Posts

Emma Watson, Daniel Radcliffe Explain Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows

Related Posts

Daniel Radcliffe Spoofs Robert Pattinson on The Simpsons

Related Posts