Clash Of The Titans: Movie Review

By

Clash of the Titans Sam Worthington as Perseus 31 3 10 kc Clash Of The Titans: Movie Review

Clash of the Titans will finally blast into theaters this weekend after a release date shuffle and a mundane 3D upgrade. The film is a remake of the 1981 Desmond Davis classic that hammers out all the stiff, campy elements we loved to make a gritty hard-hitting epic. The lead character doesn’t have any boyish charm or feathery hair, instead Sam Worthington takes over as Perseus the demigod son of Zeus, the only one who can stop Hades and his pet the Kraken from destroying mankind.

The Players:

The Plot:

In Clash of the Titans, Sam Worthington plays the bastard son of Zeus who gets caught in a power struggle between the gods. Hades is the film’s villain, the vengeful god of the Underworld, and a brave Perseus volunteers to take him down when his family falls victim to his merciless hand. From that point on he makes it his life’s mission to keep him from gaining Zeus’s power and unleashing hell on earth.

The Good:

  • The Cast: There was an interesting mix of actors who all brought something special to their performances. With the exception of one (I’ll get to that below), everyone was entertaining and fun to watch. Even though Worthington, Fiennes, and Neeson were the selling points for the film, the supporting actors were just as enjoyable.
  • The Settings: There are a lot of special effects used in this movie, but the one thing Leterrier didn’t skimp on were the locations. The landscapes were all real, and you didn’t get that 300 feeling of everything being done in a studio. In the end, that authenticity accented the story and looked great on camera.
  • Costumes: The designers amped up the masculine factor with the soldiers costumes by making them look as strong as possible considering they were wearing skirts. After a while, you forget about their legs and you start concentrating on their fights. Yes, they do wear skirts, but skirts of armor.
  • The Action: The action sequences in the film are fun to watch. The last major fight (without spoiling anything) was the best out of the bunch. It features an old favorite from the original, which happens to be a winged horse.
  • Pegasus: Speaking of winged horses, Pegasus looks amazing here. There’s such a mystery surrounding him. He comes in and out throughout the movie, but he shows up when it counts. When he unites with Perseus it’s a beautiful sight to see.
  • Io: When it was first revealed that this character was created specifically for the remake it bothered me, but in the film you realize that she does serve a purpose. She’s not just there hanging out in the shadows looking pretty. She’s essentially a plot device to get Perseus from point A to point B.
  • The Kraken: The design for the killer beast was terrifying, which is great because that’s what the Kraken is supposed to be. When it’s finally unleashed at Zeus’ command all hell breaks loose (literally) and its introduction is priceless.

The Bad:

  • The Accents: A pet peeve of mine is whenever films are set in Greek or Roman times, the characters always have British accents and in the case of Clash of the Titans, we had Australian, British, American, and Danish. No one was on the same page. In Avatar and Terminator Salvation, it appeared that Worthington at least tried to cover his natural accent, but here he tossed it to the wind.
  • Alexa Davalos: I’ve seen Ms. Davalos appear in other projects and her acting was always up to par, but that isn’t the case here. She’s very stiff and comes across as doing an impression of someone from the Royal Shakespeare Company. Her regal English portrayal just doesn’t work.

Overall:

Despite a few character flaws, Clash of the Titans is an amazing movie. It’s pure popcorn entertainment and if you go into it with that type of mindset you won’t be disappointed.

Rating: 8.5/10

Clash of the Titans opens in theaters nationwide in 2D and 3D on April 2, 2010.

Photos:

Trailer:

Get the Flash Player to see this content.

Do you plan on seeing Clash of the Titans this weekend?

COMMENTS

  1. Posted by Movie Releases: Clash of the Titans, The Last Song, The Greatest

    [...] StoriesTrailersReviewsInterviewsClash Of The Titans: Movie ReviewMovie Releases: Clash of the Titans, The Last Song, The GreatestFriday, April 2, 2010 7:30AM – By [...]

  2. Posted by Clash of the Titans Earns 4.2 Million Thursday Night

    [...] and it sounds like that’s what they’re falling back on to rake in the money. I’ve seen the movie and I’m telling you it looks perfectly fine in 2D, the extra dimension, as expected, is [...]

  3. Posted by Steve

    I saw this movie not expecting much since I don't remember the original with too much fondness, but felt this in comparison was rushed. The tone was more serious than adventurous, more real than fantasy. Which doesn't work when the climax begins when Zeus, glittering like a Twilight vampire and regaled like an Arthurian knight, demands "Release the Kraken!". The addition of Io was perplexing, and seemed shoehorned in only to narrate the story not only to viewers, but to Perseus. To disguise that role, they throw in some forced romantic tension. I noted that the climax begins when Zeus calls for the Kraken, it ends when the Kraken rears it's head. After that the ending comes seconds later, as the battle between the Kraken and Perseus and the tertiary battle between Hades and Zeus is resolved in what seemed like a minute, but was probably less.
    It wasn't a complete failure though. The Pegasus and suspense in the appearance of the Kraken were well done, as was the fight with Medusa and the design of Charon and the river Styx. If only the rest of the movie reveled in the material, it would have made a popcorn flick into a fantastic adventure, instead we get a fantastic adventure smeared onto a recycled action flick.
    Overall, I felt this movie was absurd, and not in an ironic way. In the actual, definition in the dictionary way.

  4. Posted by Charles

    People know almost nothing of clothing history. They think biological determinism causes clothing behavior. That's so false! Social forces cause clothing behavior! In 1912 the NY Times noted ONLY ONE woman wearing pants in public in NY State! Factory work in WW2 put 17 million women into pants (a social force) which before they were forbidden to wear under pretext of "transvestism." Men generally wore skirts/robes until horseback riding made the riding garment, PANTS, prevalent. Today people almost think men are born wearing pants! Ridiculous! In Roman Britain, 9,600 skirted soldiers under General Suetonius killed 80,000 Britons at the Battle of Watling Street. So much for the "effeminate skirted male." To be a sex difference a garment must be a difference of anatomy! Neither skirts nor pants qualify! The Greek army today maintains a unit of soldiers who wear skirts.

  5. Posted by Clash of The Titans 2 In the Works, Leterrier Out

    [...] busy schedule. They want to get him on board before he has to leave and shoot Avatar 2. Even though I didn’t hate Clash as much as everyone else the film does not need a sequel. The story doesn’t really permit it. [...]

  6. Posted by Kathrine Bernice Hess

    Does anyone know when this comes out on bluray? I just got a PS3 and I know its going to look schhaweeet.

POST YOUR COMMENTS