  <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010 SAG Award Nominations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screencrave.com/2009-12-17/2010-sag-award-nominations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screencrave.com/2009-12-17/2010-sag-award-nominations/</link>
	<description>Upcoming New Movies - Reviews Interviews Trailers &#38; Posters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:57:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Oscar Power Rankings: After the Flood</title>
		<link>http://screencrave.com/2009-12-17/2010-sag-award-nominations/comment-page-1/#comment-14931</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscar Power Rankings: After the Flood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screencrave.com/?p=54959#comment-14931</guid>
		<description>[...] been treated to a flood of Awards from organizations as prestigious as the Golden Globes and Screen Actors Guild all the way down to newer groups like the Austin Film Critics Society. What does it all mean? We [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been treated to a flood of Awards from organizations as prestigious as the Golden Globes and Screen Actors Guild all the way down to newer groups like the Austin Film Critics Society. What does it all mean? We [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merrik</title>
		<link>http://screencrave.com/2009-12-17/2010-sag-award-nominations/comment-page-1/#comment-14536</link>
		<dc:creator>Merrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screencrave.com/?p=54959#comment-14536</guid>
		<description>Blunt&#039;s spot stolen by Bullock? Mmmmm... someone&#039;s not paying attention. Sandra Bullock at this point is generally seen as the fourth nominee in the category (and fourth runner for an Oscar nomination). Blunt, Mirren, Cornish, Ronan &amp; Cotillard all seem to be in the running for the fifth slot (with Blunt and Mirren out in front). I don&#039;t know why anyone&#039;s shocked or thinks Bullock &quot;stole&quot; a spot from another actress at this point. Golden Globe nomination, BFCA nomination, now a SAG nomination. She&#039;s a real contender, whether people like it or not. Simply because she&#039;s usually in romantic comedies, that doesn&#039;t for some reason make her less of an actor or less deserving of recognition when she turns in a great performance like she did in The Blind Side. I hope she wins the whole thing (she won&#039;t) just so people can stop blathering about how she didn&#039;t even deserve a nomination (not that they will, but it&#039;ll be fun to see their misplaced rage at something so silly). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blunt&#039;s spot stolen by Bullock? Mmmmm&#8230; someone&#039;s not paying attention. Sandra Bullock at this point is generally seen as the fourth nominee in the category (and fourth runner for an Oscar nomination). Blunt, Mirren, Cornish, Ronan &amp; Cotillard all seem to be in the running for the fifth slot (with Blunt and Mirren out in front). I don&#039;t know why anyone&#039;s shocked or thinks Bullock &quot;stole&quot; a spot from another actress at this point. Golden Globe nomination, BFCA nomination, now a SAG nomination. She&#039;s a real contender, whether people like it or not. Simply because she&#039;s usually in romantic comedies, that doesn&#039;t for some reason make her less of an actor or less deserving of recognition when she turns in a great performance like she did in The Blind Side. I hope she wins the whole thing (she won&#039;t) just so people can stop blathering about how she didn&#039;t even deserve a nomination (not that they will, but it&#039;ll be fun to see their misplaced rage at something so silly).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Up in the Air Could Stop Oscar History</title>
		<link>http://screencrave.com/2009-12-17/2010-sag-award-nominations/comment-page-1/#comment-14495</link>
		<dc:creator>Up in the Air Could Stop Oscar History</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screencrave.com/?p=54959#comment-14495</guid>
		<description>[...] areas except for acting. The snub of Jeremy Renner was one of the biggest surprises but when the Screen Actors Guild gave their two cents, his performance was noted with a Best Actor nomination. Now he&#8217;s going [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] areas except for acting. The snub of Jeremy Renner was one of the biggest surprises but when the Screen Actors Guild gave their two cents, his performance was noted with a Best Actor nomination. Now he&#8217;s going [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 8/16 queries in 0.013 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via screencrave.frsucrave.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: screencrave.com @ 2012-02-10 16:18:40 -->
