http://screencrave.com/2009-10-14/is-the-hangover-worth-oscar-gold/ Upcoming New Movies - Reviews Interviews Trailers & Posters Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:57:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://screencrave.com/2009-10-14/is-the-hangover-worth-oscar-gold/comment-page-1/#comment-12741 The Hangover for Best Picture? Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:22:56 +0000 http://screencrave.com/?p=43359#comment-12741 [...] while back, we brought you an article stating that last summer’s The Hangover may go from a box office to a critical success this [...] [...] while back, we brought you an article stating that last summer’s The Hangover may go from a box office to a critical success this [...]

]]> http://screencrave.com/2009-10-14/is-the-hangover-worth-oscar-gold/comment-page-1/#comment-10297 anna Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:42:17 +0000 http://screencrave.com/?p=43359#comment-10297 You have got to be kidding right? The Hangover was just a lucky fluke, before it was Eddie Murphys' big lucky fluke. Neither one truly a fantastic movie. Yes The Hangover was funny I agree, but not Oscar gold. As for Zack G., he is a 40 year old man that still hasn't done anything truly in Hollywood yet. He has had only bit parts here and there. So, let's give the gold to someone who has never truly tried hard to even earn one. While all the others have worked really hard for the chance. One sidekick role in a movie doesn't make you an actor. Working hard to earn one for a while makes you a true actor. His next few movies are also only bit parts as well. I want to see him actually star in a movie first. I can't even decide if he can actually act or not. He needs to show he can truly act before he can be nominated. Heck even Danny McBrides done more work than Zack has done as a sidekick. You have got to be kidding right? The Hangover was just a lucky fluke, before it was Eddie Murphys' big lucky fluke. Neither one truly a fantastic movie. Yes The Hangover was funny I agree, but not Oscar gold. As for Zack G., he is a 40 year old man that still hasn't done anything truly in Hollywood yet. He has had only bit parts here and there. So, let's give the gold to someone who has never truly tried hard to even earn one. While all the others have worked really hard for the chance. One sidekick role in a movie doesn't make you an actor. Working hard to earn one for a while makes you a true actor. His next few movies are also only bit parts as well. I want to see him actually star in a movie first. I can't even decide if he can actually act or not. He needs to show he can truly act before he can be nominated. Heck even Danny McBrides done more work than Zack has done as a sidekick.

]]>