Comments on: Poll: Does Cameron’s Avatar Trailer Live Up to the Hype?

By: Avatar Trailer Receives Mixed Reviews

Avatar Trailer Receives Mixed Reviews — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 19:45:14 +0000

[...] this morning and has been a hot topic of discussion. Many of you went over to our official Avatar poll and gave your two cents on whether or not the trailer lived up to the hype. More on the trailer [...]

By: Revealing New Avatar Featurette

Revealing New Avatar Featurette — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:30:43 +0000

[...] Poll: Does Cameron’s Avatar Trailer Live Up to the Hype? [...]

By: Avatar International Trailer

Avatar International Trailer — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:45:21 +0000

[...] Poll: Does James Cameron’s Avatar Trailer Live Up to the Hype? [...]

By: Zach

Zach — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 13:21:36 +0000

Any one who says this looks bad has no sense of adventure or imagination and can go get f*****. This movie has amazing visual effects and is extremely unique. It looks amazing.

By: Andy287

Andy287 — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:48:15 +0000

Sub-standard animation + obvious, spoon-fed morality story. Yawn.

Why is it that so many of the great directors/producers start to turn out crap in their old age?

By: Masana82

Masana82 — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:52:49 +0000

Noodle, I forgot to mention … the time travel plot in the Star Trek movie, yeah … it is a flaw.
Cheers!

By: Masana82

Masana82 — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:41:59 +0000

If you can preserve the mind then you got yourself immortality, the body is just a container, that can be replaced over and over again, despites if it is human or na’vi. I’ll grant you that, I left out they could create a human body just as easy as they created an alien one, I assumed that was included. So let's see… you got yourself genetically changed bodies, you can create them as you please… how long does the process take? How fast do you age? Can you create a genetically changed body that doesn't age? Could you create a genetically changed body that doesn’t age, is stronger and faster? See where this is going? If they don't have an excellent explanation in the movie for them not to be creating human/na’vi bodies like that, the whole plot is dumb. FYI: I've never watched Star Trek, only the new movie, and the comic fight scene of Kirk vs lizard man, that is hilarious. I don't even know what you were trying to apply by your last phrase on your last post, feel free too attack me personally, I really don't care about it, just remember it won't change the facts.

By: Noodle

Noodle — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 08:47:23 +0000

Jesus Christ it's a friggen Trekkie! First of all there is no immortality being presented in this movie. The alien is his Avatar that he controls through technology. It doesn't make him live forever. He's in a stasis chamber when he's operating the Alien. So that's mute. Now if you were sharp they real flaw you would see is why can't they cure Sam Worthington of being paralized if they can grow aliens. Tell ya what you keep watching reruns of Star Trek, I use to think they were good too when I was 8!

By: Masana82

Masana82 — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:47:27 +0000

Yeah, Star Wars was good when I was 8. I'm sure if it was today, things would be different. BTW, the new episodes didn’t added anything to the plot that I didn’t already know, but they were fun for the special effects, soundtrack and the actors’ effort. There’s a difference between saying the movie sucks, to pointing out the flaw in its plot. Like I said: I have no stocks on whether it’s going to be a hit or not, but if the plot has a flaw, I get pissed off (mind you: I liked the trailer, if you didn’t read the first time). I’ll tell you what: Let’s exchange emails, come December we watch the movie and I’ll tell you if there is a flaw or not. If doesn’t I will apologize for my harsh words. Deal?

By: Masana82

Masana82 — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:45:20 +0000

Noodle, I'm sure anyone who would be after valuable minerals would be seeking that so one could live longer and prosper. If you're living longer than the rest and are prospering from it, why would you concern yourself with anything else? Power? For what? You are a highkander, you have the information! As I said, they must have an exceptional explanation; otherwise, it is just dumb. About originality, I don't know about you, but I'm tired of the same cliché stories with the same conflicts over and over again in all these movies. Can't they do something different for a change?! Is that ask too much?! Hey… I noticed I have the right to complain if I don't like something. So, that’s what I’m doing.

By: Masana82

Masana82 — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:59:22 +0000

Is gravity just a theory, or is it a fact? Is thermodynamics just a theory, or is it a fact? Is relativity a theory, or a fact?
In science, theory is a fact not a hypothesis: "As used in science, a theory is an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning, especially one that has been tested and confirmed as a general principle helping to explain and predict natural phenomena. "

By: crazy guy

crazy guy — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:12:26 +0000

not really, its still just a theory, srry pall, they lie to us at skools…all that stuff u took in bio, alot of the stuff they say is fact that is based on evolution, has actually been proven false….