  <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rachelle Lefevre Hurt By Twilight Recasting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screencrave.com/2009-07-30/rachelle-lefevre-twilight-recasting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screencrave.com/2009-07-30/rachelle-lefevre-twilight-recasting/</link>
	<description>Upcoming New Movies - Reviews Interviews Trailers &#38; Posters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:57:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Twilight&#8217;s Kellan Lutz, Ashley Greene Are Holding Up Breaking Dawn</title>
		<link>http://screencrave.com/2009-07-30/rachelle-lefevre-twilight-recasting/comment-page-1/#comment-27933</link>
		<dc:creator>Twilight&#8217;s Kellan Lutz, Ashley Greene Are Holding Up Breaking Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 16:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screencrave.com/?p=30112#comment-27933</guid>
		<description>[...] time someone from the series tried to hold out over money they kicked them to the curb, just look at Rachel Lefevre. They said she left because of &#8220;scheduling conflicts&#8221; but we all know the truth. Summit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] time someone from the series tried to hold out over money they kicked them to the curb, just look at Rachel Lefevre. They said she left because of &#8220;scheduling conflicts&#8221; but we all know the truth. Summit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miffed</title>
		<link>http://screencrave.com/2009-07-30/rachelle-lefevre-twilight-recasting/comment-page-1/#comment-10515</link>
		<dc:creator>miffed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screencrave.com/?p=30112#comment-10515</guid>
		<description>ridiculous move-Ron Howard is fantastic, but it&#039;s obvious HE is the only reason his daughter was cast. They should not have taken this away from the actress who has established and become recognizable as this character. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ridiculous move-Ron Howard is fantastic, but it&#039;s obvious HE is the only reason his daughter was cast. They should not have taken this away from the actress who has established and become recognizable as this character.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn</title>
		<link>http://screencrave.com/2009-07-30/rachelle-lefevre-twilight-recasting/comment-page-1/#comment-8156</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 00:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screencrave.com/?p=30112#comment-8156</guid>
		<description>mymy this is sad she did such a good job they shouldnt replace her its not gonna feel right ;/ </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mymy this is sad she did such a good job they shouldnt replace her its not gonna feel right ;/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://screencrave.com/2009-07-30/rachelle-lefevre-twilight-recasting/comment-page-1/#comment-6280</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screencrave.com/?p=30112#comment-6280</guid>
		<description>tldnr... 
 
Probably the worst books I have read... ever. Yes, I read them all. It was the sexually budding 11 year old girl in me. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tldnr&#8230; </p>
<p>Probably the worst books I have read&#8230; ever. Yes, I read them all. It was the sexually budding 11 year old girl in me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IrritatedWithSummit</title>
		<link>http://screencrave.com/2009-07-30/rachelle-lefevre-twilight-recasting/comment-page-1/#comment-6273</link>
		<dc:creator>IrritatedWithSummit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screencrave.com/?p=30112#comment-6273</guid>
		<description>Krystal - I&#039;m a huge Twilight fan and I&#039;m frustrated by Summit&#039;s decision to replace Lefevre. The third is a pivotal book/film for her character, Victoria, and it&#039;s absurd for her to be replaced at this point. Howard is a fine actress and I&#039;m very impressed by her work, but Lefevre should be allowed to complete the role she brought to life on screen. She did an amazing job in the first film and it doesn&#039;t feel right for her to depart now.  My suspicion is that b/c Eclipse is such an important book/film for the character, Victoria, Summit&#039;s decision was not one made based on a 10-day shooting overlap, but rather they wanted a bigger name to handle Victoria&#039;s larger and more central role in Eclipse. I find this frustrating given that the director has already been replaced, and certain key changes needed to be made in the original movie due to overly-aggressive shoot schedules that threatened the integrity of the story and the actors&#039; performances. The more changes Summit makes to the franchise will only continue to distract from the excitement surrounding the series. It&#039;s also insulting to the fans, who frankly have made this into a winning franchise, even during an economic crisis. Perhaps they can stop running away with the series and focus in on what the fans would want and that is no further changes and scripts that serve to honor the original book series as closely as possible.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Krystal &#8211; I&#039;m a huge Twilight fan and I&#039;m frustrated by Summit&#039;s decision to replace Lefevre. The third is a pivotal book/film for her character, Victoria, and it&#039;s absurd for her to be replaced at this point. Howard is a fine actress and I&#039;m very impressed by her work, but Lefevre should be allowed to complete the role she brought to life on screen. She did an amazing job in the first film and it doesn&#039;t feel right for her to depart now.  My suspicion is that b/c Eclipse is such an important book/film for the character, Victoria, Summit&#039;s decision was not one made based on a 10-day shooting overlap, but rather they wanted a bigger name to handle Victoria&#039;s larger and more central role in Eclipse. I find this frustrating given that the director has already been replaced, and certain key changes needed to be made in the original movie due to overly-aggressive shoot schedules that threatened the integrity of the story and the actors&#039; performances. The more changes Summit makes to the franchise will only continue to distract from the excitement surrounding the series. It&#039;s also insulting to the fans, who frankly have made this into a winning franchise, even during an economic crisis. Perhaps they can stop running away with the series and focus in on what the fans would want and that is no further changes and scripts that serve to honor the original book series as closely as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 8/18 queries in 0.012 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via screencrave.frsucrave.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: screencrave.com @ 2012-02-10 18:55:38 -->
