  <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Megan Fox or Michael Bay: Who&#8217;ll Return for Transformers 3?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screencrave.com/2009-07-03/megan-fox-or-michael-bay-wholl-return-for-transformers-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screencrave.com/2009-07-03/megan-fox-or-michael-bay-wholl-return-for-transformers-3/</link>
	<description>Upcoming New Movies - Reviews Interviews Trailers &#38; Posters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:57:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan Fox DROPPED From Transformers 3!!!</title>
		<link>http://screencrave.com/2009-07-03/megan-fox-or-michael-bay-wholl-return-for-transformers-3/comment-page-1/#comment-28786</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan Fox DROPPED From Transformers 3!!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 22:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screencrave.com/?p=25984#comment-28786</guid>
		<description>[...] the first Transformers catapulted her career into the stratosphere, Fox and Bay had a very public verbal war regarding his directing practices and her lack of interest in the films. A lot of us thought her [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the first Transformers catapulted her career into the stratosphere, Fox and Bay had a very public verbal war regarding his directing practices and her lack of interest in the films. A lot of us thought her [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dustin</title>
		<link>http://screencrave.com/2009-07-03/megan-fox-or-michael-bay-wholl-return-for-transformers-3/comment-page-1/#comment-9980</link>
		<dc:creator>dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screencrave.com/?p=25984#comment-9980</guid>
		<description>hell yea she so fine  
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hell yea she so fine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronnie</title>
		<link>http://screencrave.com/2009-07-03/megan-fox-or-michael-bay-wholl-return-for-transformers-3/comment-page-1/#comment-5282</link>
		<dc:creator>ronnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screencrave.com/?p=25984#comment-5282</guid>
		<description>I would rather have Megan Fox return rather then Bay. I don&#039;t think bay has launched all those stars. LaBeouf had been in Even Stevens, I robot, Indiana Jones Kingdom of the crystal skull, Holes, hosted Saturday night live, and was in the Even Stevens movie. Before he was in Transformers he had already been a big star without Bay. But I agree with Bay that no one knew Fox before she was in Transformers. I think that without Fox the film will just falter.I don&#039;t think any one cares who is directing the movie. Unless you are a total fanatic about bay. I think most fans go for the giant robots, LaBeouf, and Fox not the diector. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would rather have Megan Fox return rather then Bay. I don&#039;t think bay has launched all those stars. LaBeouf had been in Even Stevens, I robot, Indiana Jones Kingdom of the crystal skull, Holes, hosted Saturday night live, and was in the Even Stevens movie. Before he was in Transformers he had already been a big star without Bay. But I agree with Bay that no one knew Fox before she was in Transformers. I think that without Fox the film will just falter.I don&#039;t think any one cares who is directing the movie. Unless you are a total fanatic about bay. I think most fans go for the giant robots, LaBeouf, and Fox not the diector.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel</title>
		<link>http://screencrave.com/2009-07-03/megan-fox-or-michael-bay-wholl-return-for-transformers-3/comment-page-1/#comment-5205</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 00:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screencrave.com/?p=25984#comment-5205</guid>
		<description>Megan Fox!!! :D </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Megan Fox!!! <img src='http://screencrave.frsucrave.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsey</title>
		<link>http://screencrave.com/2009-07-03/megan-fox-or-michael-bay-wholl-return-for-transformers-3/comment-page-1/#comment-5200</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screencrave.com/?p=25984#comment-5200</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m fine with Bay returning, as &quot;Transformers&quot; is pretty much his baby. Fox dissed the product while promoting it; that&#039;s not good business. If she did come back after doing so, it&#039;d be kind of lame... why ever would you want to bite the hand that feeds you? I don&#039;t think Bay mentioned the actors who have launced to superstardom necessarily to stroke his own ego, but honestly, blockbusters have the worldwide ability to blow a person up as it were. The exposure, if not the quality in acting ability, can be priceless. I can see his point... I can see her point, too - but they might want to either word it better, or not say anything at all. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m fine with Bay returning, as &quot;Transformers&quot; is pretty much his baby. Fox dissed the product while promoting it; that&#039;s not good business. If she did come back after doing so, it&#039;d be kind of lame&#8230; why ever would you want to bite the hand that feeds you? I don&#039;t think Bay mentioned the actors who have launced to superstardom necessarily to stroke his own ego, but honestly, blockbusters have the worldwide ability to blow a person up as it were. The exposure, if not the quality in acting ability, can be priceless. I can see his point&#8230; I can see her point, too &#8211; but they might want to either word it better, or not say anything at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penelope</title>
		<link>http://screencrave.com/2009-07-03/megan-fox-or-michael-bay-wholl-return-for-transformers-3/comment-page-1/#comment-5198</link>
		<dc:creator>penelope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screencrave.com/?p=25984#comment-5198</guid>
		<description>I think Bay knows Megan doesn&#039;t mean more than half of the things she says so hopefully they&#039;ll both be back because I would hate to se McG direct the third transformers. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Bay knows Megan doesn&#039;t mean more than half of the things she says so hopefully they&#039;ll both be back because I would hate to se McG direct the third transformers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penny</title>
		<link>http://screencrave.com/2009-07-03/megan-fox-or-michael-bay-wholl-return-for-transformers-3/comment-page-1/#comment-5197</link>
		<dc:creator>penny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screencrave.com/?p=25984#comment-5197</guid>
		<description>This is weird, both? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is weird, both?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/21 queries in 0.015 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via screencrave.frsucrave.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: screencrave.com @ 2012-02-10 22:18:52 -->
