<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disney Developing New Hand-Drawn Winnie the Pooh Movie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screencrave.com/2009-06-02/disney-developing-new-hand-drawn-winnie-the-pooh-movie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screencrave.com/2009-06-02/disney-developing-new-hand-drawn-winnie-the-pooh-movie/</link>
	<description>Upcoming New Movies - Reviews Interviews Trailers &#38; Posters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 23:27:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas</title>
		<link>http://screencrave.com/2009-06-02/disney-developing-new-hand-drawn-winnie-the-pooh-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-3998</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screencrave.com/?p=21710#comment-3998</guid>
		<description>It could be ok if they come up with a decent story and go back to the whimsy of the original Pooh stories rather than the pre-school merchandising fodder that Disney Corp. had turned Pooh into over the years. 
 
But overall ... meh ... why do we need another one of these ?   I would much rather see them developing new stories and pushing the stylistic envelope of hand-drawn animation rather than always looking back to the past.    Pixar is clearly the studio that is considered the Leader and the Forward Looking studio , while Disney Animation seems to be positioned now to always be the &quot;B&quot; studio.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could be ok if they come up with a decent story and go back to the whimsy of the original Pooh stories rather than the pre-school merchandising fodder that Disney Corp. had turned Pooh into over the years. </p>
<p>But overall &#8230; meh &#8230; why do we need another one of these ?   I would much rather see them developing new stories and pushing the stylistic envelope of hand-drawn animation rather than always looking back to the past.    Pixar is clearly the studio that is considered the Leader and the Forward Looking studio , while Disney Animation seems to be positioned now to always be the &quot;B&quot; studio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 12/15 queries in 0.012 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via screencrave.frsucrave.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: screencrave.com @ 2012-05-27 08:19:42 -->
